Monday, September 28, 2026

Blog Post 5 The Invention of The Pen

In today's era, it is easy to take for granted the fact we have an item to permanently write information with, or the pen. Today, we use pens to take notes, sign documents, complete assignments, and write down ideas without thinking much about the technology itself. However, the pen has a history stretching back thousands of years. Rather than being invented by one person, the modern pen developed through a long series of improvements that made writing easier, faster, cleaner, and more accessible.

The Reed Pen

Early versions of the pen included reed pens. According to Dartmouth College's Ancient Books Lab, reed writing instruments were used during classical antiquity, including in Egypt and Greece. Reeds could be cut and shaped to form a nib that held and transferred ink. Later, quill pens became an important writing technology. The Smithsonian National Museum of American History explains that quills were generally made using feathers from geese or swans. Their hollow shafts acted as small ink reservoirs after the pen was dipped into an inkwell. Quills remained a primary writing instrument until mass-produced dip pens emerged around 1820. [sites.dartmouth.edu][americanhi...ory.si.edu],

These developments solved a basic communication problem: people needed practical ways to permanently record information. Writing allowed ideas, records, knowledge, and personal messages to exist beyond a face-to-face conversation. Still, older pens had limitations. Writers repeatedly dipped their pens into ink, while later fountain pens attempted to make writing more convenient by carrying an internal ink supply.

Ballpoint Pen

One of the biggest changes came with the ballpoint pen. In 1888, American inventor John J. Loud patented a pen that used a roller-ball tip and an ink reservoir. His design was intended to mark rough materials such as leather, but it did not become a successful everyday writing instrument. [digitalgal...y.bgsu.edu]

Decades later, Hungarian journalist László Bíró helped transform the idea into the modern ballpoint. Bíró became frustrated with fountain pens, including the inconvenience of refilling them and dealing with smudged ink. He worked on a design in which ink was transferred through a small rotating ball at the pen's tip. Further improvements allowed ink to flow more reliably and helped make ballpoint pens practical. By the 1940s, they were becoming increasingly popular. [digitalgal...y.bgsu.edu]

From a communication perspective, that development matters. The evolution from quills to dip pens, fountain pens, and finally inexpensive ballpoints made handwritten communication increasingly convenient. The Smithsonian specifically documents this technological progression from drawing and dip pens through fountain pens to ballpoint pens. Pens could be carried almost anywhere, quickly used, and produced for everyday consumers. [americanhi...ory.si.edu]


Pens have also played a role in some of society's most important forms of communication. They preserve personal thoughts in diaries, allow students to record information, make signatures possible on contracts, and turn political decisions into written law. For example, the Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture preserves one of the pens President Lyndon B. Johnson used to sign the Civil Rights Act of 1964. That object demonstrates how something as ordinary as a pen can become connected to major historical change. [nmaahc.si.edu]

The pen's impact is not entirely positive. Written communication does not contain the immediate tone, facial expressions, or feedback available in face-to-face communication, meaning messages can sometimes be misunderstood. Modern disposable pens also encourage a culture in which writing instruments are often treated as replaceable objects rather than permanent tools. Still, their benefits to communication are difficult to ignore.

As a communication major, I think the most important part of the pen's history is not simply who invented a particular version. It is how people continually improved the technology to make sharing and preserving information easier. From reeds and feathers to a ballpoint pen that fits in a backpack, each development addressed limitations of the technology before it. The result is a communication tool so convenient that we barely notice how much it changed the world.

Academic / Credible Sources to Link in Your Blog

  1. “Pens.” National Museum of American History, 2026, https://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/object-groups/pens-and-pencils/pens. Accessed 28 Sept. 2026.
  2. “Object Quill Pens.” National Museum of American History Behring Center, https://www.americanhistory.si.edu/collections/object/nmah_318510. Accessed 28 Sept. 2026
  3. Tifa, Carlos. “The Writing Instrument ( The Reed and Quill) and Ink – Dartmouth Ancient Books Lab.” Dartmouth.Edu, 24 May 2016, https://sites.dartmouth.edu/ancientbooks/2016/05/23/the-writing-instrument-the-reed-and-quill-and-ink/. Accessed 28 Sept. 2026.

  4. “Ballpoint Pens · Literacy Artifacts: Preserving Tools, Methods, and Teachers’ Technologies of the Long Nineteenth Century · Student Digital Gallery · BGSU Libraries.” Digitalgallery.Bgsu.Edu, https://digitalgallery.bgsu.edu/student/exhibits/show/literacy/writingtechnologies/stephenpractice/ballpoint-pens. Accessed 28 Sept. 2026.
  5. “Pen Used by Lyndon B. Johnson to Sign the 1964 Civil Rights Act.” National Museum of African American History and Culture, https://nmaahc.si.edu/object/nmaahc_2012.147ab. Accessed 28 Sept. 2026.

  6. Wilson, Andrew. “The History of Pens.” Executive Pens Direct, 16 Mar. 2023, https://www.executivepensdirect.com/en-us/blogs/help-advice/the-history-of-pens. Accessed 28 Sept. 2026.
  7. “AFunCan.Com | Play HTML5 Games.” Afuncan.Com, https://afuncan.com/#. Accessed 28 Sept. 2026.
  8. Baronfig Team. “What Does ‘Pen to Paper’ Mean?” Baronfig, 23 May 2024, https://baronfig.com/blogs/blog/what-does-pen-to-paper-mean. Accessed 28 Sept. 2026.

AI Disclosure: AI was used in the research and information for this blog post. All information came from the sources listed above that have been verified through myself. I then promoted Microsoft CoPilot Pro to help me shape the information from the sources into a blog post of between 500 and 700 words written in smooth professional style. Finally, I added appropriate images and captions to help break up the type and giveth post a more professional look.

Saturday, September 12, 2026

Blog Post 4 Privacy On and Off

The two TED Talks we watched in class, starring Juan Enriquez and Catherine Crump respectively, made me realize how much of a struggle it is to maintain privacy in a world full of technological surveillance. These two videos went into depth about the threat of immortality. While this does not mean that people can live forever, it implies a much deeper problem. The term immortality is being used to warn us of what Juan Enriquez calls "Electronic Tattoos." That every post, comment, and picture shared online will always be online. Another big issue these videos highlight is how much information is being collected without our consent.

To expound more on the first issue, every post or detail submitted into the internet becomes a permeant part of our image and identity. Many employers, families, friends, and coworkers use the information online about others in order to form their impressions and opinions about a person. So any bad day or controversial post could ruin your repetition with everyone around you and get you "cancelled". This is a apparent problem because most of us do not comprehend the future consequences of sharing posts that seem innocent or fun.



With the second problem involving the amount of intel gathered online, we dive into the problem with how much information is being shared with the public, or more specifically, how much information is being collected from selected individuals. Catherine Crump does into detail about how there are automatic license plate readers that can track where people go and create a portfolio of intel about their daily lives. 
    
    With this kind of intel, the government or whomever collects this data can track your every movement and even predict certain kinds of patterns in your life. For instance, if you drive to a school everyday, the data collectors can tell that you either go to school or drop off people who do go to school and therefore send you promotional ads for educational-related products. Because we do not know how much intel these data collectors have gathered, we do not know what in our lives is actually private and what is very public information.

I believe the government needs to make and enforce laws and policies to protect people's privacy. This can include shutting down license plate readers, preventing ai analysis of security cameras, or sending company heads to jail for ignoring town, city, state, or federal decision when it comes to banning security cameras being built. Technology needs to have heavy surveillance in order to ensure we the people maintain our freedom to privacy and that sensitive information cannot fall into the wrong hands. At the very least, limits on how this intel can be collected and used should be implemented so that people know what is being shared. 


However, I also believe that we need to better understand the consequences of posting online. Many individuals share too much information about their personal lives on social media platforms, which tends to lead to people with bad intentions learning a little too much about you. We need to think before posting and remember that what is posted and removed is not actually gone from the platform.

In the end, I learned from the TED Talks that privacy is being taken for granted when it should not. That if we do not act now to prevent our right to privacy being taken away, we may just fall into a scenario just like 1984. While being careful about what we share online is important, we need to also prioritize preventing outside sources rom collecting our data by force.

Friday, September 4, 2026

Blog Post 3: Connecting The Speech Theory of Promoting Tolerance with Social media


    Out of the eight values of free expression, I find that I connect with the most is by promoting tolerance. This idea focuses on the fact that with free speech comes the protection of hateful or upsetting speech, and this protection teaches us to be more tolerant in society. I believe having this kind of tolerance helps us connect more regardless of the minor things we may disagree on, while also making it so we can politely debate over major issues we may disagree on due to the patience that tolerance brings to hear the other opinions. And with a more tolerant society, we have a better society.

    I believe this concept is vital in today's society due to the overexposure to different opinions on the internet or social media. Many people can fall in fits of rage over other people's opinions; whether it is political, social, or simply personal beliefs. However, the 1st Amendment allows anyone to share opinions regardless of how controversial or infuriating they can be. https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/ The tolerance formed through this exposure gives us the ability to be patient and listen to understand the opposing opinions rather than listening to argue against.

    Promoting Tolerance actually aids in another theory: Participation in Self-Government. The theory of participation in self government relates to promoting tolerance because in order for the general public to make informed decisions regarding politics, the people must be able to freely discuss any kind of political issues. 
    During elections, we hear directly from the candidates about their opinions, what they plan to do in office, what their priorities are, and many other facts that allow us to make decisions based on our own viewpoints. Research from the 2024 election found that the two most common sources of election information for votes were friends and family and news stories. https://journalistsresource.org/home/information-sources-voting-decisions-2024-election/  
    While the candidates are running for their position, the people talk to each other to learn about facts on the candidates that may not have been mentioned in debates or speeches, providing as much information as possible to the public. If people were not allowed to express their political views, voters would have much less information on hand when in the voting booths.

    Both of these theories are essential in a functional society because they work together to create an environment where people can express different opinions while staying united regardless of differing opinions.  While we may not agree on everything all of the time, having this freedom to participate in vital discussion regarding our government gives the people a voice in said government and make informed decisions based on the information gathered.


I think a good instance where we see these two theories working in day-to-day life is social media. People post on a 24/7 basis about anything and everything. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/fact-sheet/social-media-and-news-fact-sheet/ And with this 24/7 posting, comes endless opportunities for debates and disputes to occur where people may not agree. Being able to put in the effort to understand others' opinions can help us become more open-minded. 
    At the same time, being able to participate in political discussion gives the public a voice in governmental decisions and grants the people the ability to make decisions based off of the information received. Whether it's about what type of dog is the cutest or who would make a good first female president, opinions will differ and having the tolerance and patience to hear each one out will benefit everyone.

Another example of both theories working in our lives are town hall meetings and community meetings. These meetings give citizens the chance to vocalize their issues affecting their communities directly to government officials and hear the opinions of the people who can have different views. No matter how heated these conversations become, everyone has the chance to speak and listen to other viewpoints, allowing the community to make informed decisions. In order for a democracy to function properly, the public must have the ability to disagree without shutting down other voices or opinions.